Porto Wordpress Theme

DISC Lite5

DISC Lite5 is an integrated 21dBi Dual Chain 802.11n CPE with a 600MHz CPU, 64MB RAM, 1x 10/100Mbps Ethernet port and RouterOS L3 installed. The DISC uses a backfire type antenna which allows to reach 21dBi gain in such a low cost and compact package.

The device comes complete with a power supply, PoE injector and mounting kit for a ultra low cost at $48!

The RouterOS Level3 allows to use the DISC Lite5 as CPE or Point-to-Point 5GHz links.
We have two versions available.

– DISC Lite5 US (USA) is factory locked for 5170-5250MHz and 5725-5835MHz frequencies. This lock can not be removed.

– DISC Lite5 (International) supports 5150MHz-5875MHz range.

  • Description
  • Reviews (1)
  • Ethernet test results

Description

Product specifications

Details
Product code RBDisc-5nD
10/100 Ethernet ports 1
802.11a Yes
802.11n Yes
Antenna gain 21
CPU AR9344
CPU core count 1
CPU nominal frequency 600 MHz
Dimensions ⌀ 265mm, height: 80mm
License level 3
Max Power consumption 6W
Number of chains 2
Operating System RouterOS
PoE in Yes
Size of RAM 64 MB
Storage size 16 MB
Storage type FLASH
Supported input voltage 11 V – 30 V
Tested ambient temperature -40°C .. +70°C
Wireless chip model AR9344
Wireless standards 802.11a/n
Suggested price

1 review for DISC Lite5

  1. 5 out of 5

    Good


Add a review

RBDisc-5nD AR9344 (600MHz) 100M 1 port test
Mode Configuration 1518 byte 512 byte 64 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 8.1 98.4 23.5 96.3 182.5 93.4
Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 8.1 98.4 23.5 96.3 87.6 44.9
Routing none (fast path) 8.1 98.4 23.5 96.3 182.5 93.4
Routing 25 simple queues 8.1 98.4 23.5 96.3 106.6 54.6
Routing 25 ip filter rules 8.1 98.4 23.5 96.3 60.5 31.0
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results