Porto Wordpress Theme

Products

mANTBox 15s

The mANTBox is based on our new mANT sector antennas, but also has a wireless router built right in. Powered by the RB921 device, the mANTBox comes ready to use with everything included. The device uses a high speed 720MHz CPU and has a built in 802.11 ac/a/n wireless device with up to 31dBm output power.

mANTBox 15s comes with 15dBi 120 degree sector antenna

– RB921GS-5HPacD-15S-US (USA) is factory locked for 5170-5250MHz and 5725-5835MHz frequencies. This lock can not be removed.

– RB921GS-5HPacD-15S (International) supports 5150MHz-5875MHz range.

  • Description
  • Reviews (1)
  • Ethernet test results

Description

Product specifications

Details
Product code RB921GS-5HPacD-15S
10/100/1000 Ethernet ports 1
802.11a Yes
802.11n Yes
Antenna gain 15
CPU QCA9557
CPU core count 1
CPU nominal frequency 720 MHz
Dimensions 140 x 348 x 82 mm
License level 4
Max Power consumption 13W
Number of chains 2
Operating System RouterOS
PCB temperature monitor Yes
PoE in Yes
Power Jack 1
SFP ports 1
Size of RAM 128 MB
Storage size 128 MB
Storage type NAND
Supported input voltage 9 V – 30 V
Tested ambient temperature -30 + 70 C
Voltage Monitor Yes
Wireless chip model QCA9882
Wireless standards 802.11a/n/ac
Suggested price

1 review for mANTBox 15s

  1. 5 out of 5

    Good


Add a review

RB921GS-5HPacD-15S QCA9557 1G all port test
Mode Configuration 1518 byte 512 byte 64 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 81.2 986.1 234.9 962.2 477.7 244.6
Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 81.2 986.1 118.4 485.0 119.5 61.2
Routing none (fast path) 81.2 986.1 234.9 962.2 408.2 209.0
Routing 25 simple queues 81.2 986.1 158.3 648.4 165.8 84.9
Routing 25 ip filter rules 64.8 786.9 70.4 288.4 60.9 31.2
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results